Hang on I thought it was supposed to be the other way around? But no, in the Kafkaesque world of the upper echelons of the most politicised police force this side of Zimbabwe, Senior Members of the Metropolitan Police Force have effectively sued the IPCC as it looked like it might criticise them over the death of Jean Charles De Menezes.
In a Report issued tomorrow, the IPCC has massively backtracked from it's original stance, and has cleared all the senior officers who work directly under Sir Ian Blair. This was nothing to do with them being free of blame, more the fact that they had taken the IPCC to court (all paid for by the Police Federation by the way) as presumably it was doing it's job far too well. If only Crippen had tried that on, he would have escaped hanging - not because he was innocent but taht a guilty verdict might hurt his feelings.
However the good news is that Andy Hayman - the most senior counter terrorist officer in the country - is to get a mild slap on the wrist, as he was "deliberately misleading" over his handling of the affair, namely:
-Lying to the press over the fact that Menezes had a bulky coat with wires hanging out, refused to stop for police and jumped the barrier at stockwell tube.
-Allowing his cretinous boss - Sir Ian Blair - walk in front of the worlds press and announce to the world that Menezes was a terrorist when half the met know he wasn't.
-Allowing crucial evidence (CCTV tapes and police records) to be either tampered with or lost.
However Hayman will not lose his job, or even face disciplinary action, just a stern word before bedtime. Not that Hayman is going to give a flying toss as he was awarded a CBE in Tony Blair's farewell honours round, for his services to whipping up the climate of fear and for smearing dead people in the press - another great new Labour tradition.
Liberty Box Office Stats
Believe it or not we are still getting bums on seats, and by a stroke of fluke more than anythng else, we were the highest grossing British film last weekend (unless you count Harry Potter which is about as British as a sausage filled with Californian pork.)
Also we discovered that our distribtor was actually given a whole £4000 by the film council to help with the release of the film. The full list of all the awards is below, and the staggering thing is that we are the only British film on the list (that isn't a 30 year old classic being re-released)
Film Council P&A awards 2007
$307,980 (£151,606) to Icon for Olivier Dahan's La Vie En Rose
$225,056 (£110,774) to Revolver Entertainment for Guillaume Canet's Tell No One
$203,146 (£100,000) to Pathe for Laurent Tirard's Moliere
$10,158 (£5,000) to The Works UK Distribution for Paris Je T'aime
$10,158 (£5,000) to Peccadillo for Tony Gatlif's Transylvania
$10,158 (£5,000) to Park Circus for Laurence Oliver's Hamlet
$10,158 (£5,000) to Park Circus for Laurence Olivier's Richard III
$10,158 (£5,000) to Tartan for Ingmar Bergman's Seventh Seal
$9,141 (£4,500) to Park Circus for Alexander Korda's The Thief Of Baghdad
$9,438 (£4,646) to Dogwoof Pictures for Tomasz Konecki and Andrzej Saramonowicz for Testosterone
$8,126 (£4,000) to Revolver Entertainment for Chris Atkins' Taking Liberties
$7,110 (£3,500) to the BFI for digital distribution of three John Cassavetes classics
Also, the P&A fund gave $158,458 (£78,000) to Optimum and $73,133 (£36,000) to Park Circus for their seven-week retrospective Summer Of British Film. Optimum is handling Billy Liar, The Wicker Man and The Dam Busters, while Park Circus is releasing Goldfinger, Brief Encounter, Henry V and Withnail and I.
11 comments:
13 September, 2007
Mr. Ron Parsons
Administrative Crown Council
Room 601, 17 Church Street
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5H5
Honourable Wally Oppal
Attorney General
PO Box 9044, STN PROV GOVT
Victoria, B.C. V8W 9E2
AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca
Mr. Leonard Krog
Opposition Critic for the Attorney General
Room 201
Parliament Buildings
Victoria, B.C. V8V 1X4
leonard.krog.mla@leg.bc.ca
Honourable Tom Christensen
Minister of Children and Family Development
PO Box 9057, STN PROV GOVT
Victoria, B.C. V8W 9E2
Minister.MCF@gems1.gov.bc.ca
Premier Gordon Campbell
Government of British Columbia
PO Box 9041
STN PROV GOVT
Victoria, B.C. V8W 9E1
premier@gov.bc.ca
William J.S. Elliott
RCMP Commissioner
Headquarters Bldg.
1200 Vanier Parkway
Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0R2
Superintendent Jeff Lott
R.C.M.P. Nanaimo
303 Prideaux Street
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 2N3
ASSAULT #1 Officers in Charge
Staff Sergeant Doug Chisholm
Constable M.R.W. Picard
R.C.M.P. Nanaimo
303 Prideaux Street
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 2N3
ASSAULT #2 Officers in Charge
Staff Sergeant Mike Wilton
Const. Samantha Staveley
Constable Jeanne Vestergaard
R.C.M.P. Nanaimo
303 Prideaux Street
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 2N3
Re: NO CONCRETE ACTION BY NANAIMO R.C.M.P. RELATED TO:
ASSAULT #1 - “death” comments, “threats of violence”, continued intimidation, harassment, at home and work site(s) - R.C.M.P. Complaint File # 2007-30449
ASSAULT #2 -”pedophile” / “pervert” statements, “incest” statements, threat statements, false accusation statements, and continued harassment / intimidation - R.C.M.P. Complaint File # 2007 - 24724; R.C.M.P. Complaint File # 2007 - 31803
Our situation is quite simple.
We are being “hammered” from some “quick tempered” bastard staying at Unit 12 and some miscreant tenant at Unit 42 and the R.C.M.P. have done nothing to take a Peace Bond and/or charge.
And the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say we just have to put up with this crap!!!
Absolute nonsense!!!
We are not going to put up with this crap and will someone get these Nanaimo R.C.M.P. “off their duffs” to obtain my Peace Bond and protect my mother!!!
In fact, Const. Samantha Staveley threatened my mother with charges if she continues to call the R.C.M.P. for help?
Well “chew on this” … I am so fed up that I’m putting it on the internet to see what the whole world things about the R.C.M.P. inaction!!!
ASSAULT #1
I don’t appreciate the R.C.M.P. dragging their feet in protecting me [I‘m a 20 year old, single female].
In fact, my employer got the distinct impression that the R.C.M.P. were hoping the whole matter would go away?
Well, believe me, it’s not going away!
I‘ve put up with “death” comments against me 22 August, “why don’t you just die,” “drop dead“ by Jered?? [staying at Unit 12] and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
I‘ve put up with “threats of violence” against me on 23 August, “I would like to punch your f----ing faces in” [R.C.M.P. Complaint File # 2007-30449] by Jered?? [staying at Unit 12] and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
This Jered has also been to my work site three times out of four, calling me a “piece of shit” just this past Sunday, 2nd September and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
This Jered guy again was again at my work site on September 9 when he passed by me this time calling me a “f---ing bitch”, giving me “the finger”, and walking off and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
Although this Jered guy had promised Cnst. Picard he would be long moved by this date, I saw this this Jered get into his van about 3:15 p.m., where this Jered guy gave me “the finger” again and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
I have not been sitting out front of my Unit for fear of this Jered guy!
However, what happens 12 September at about 7 p.m., when for the first time in weeks, I sit out front of my Unit … the adult male [Dan / George or whatever his name is] staying with the tenant Christine Sheppard at Unit 12 says to me “your time is coming soon” [caught on tape]?
Just like this gutless Jered guy, this Dan / George from Unit 12 said his comment low enough for me to hear [but luckily, his threat “your time is coming soon” was loud enough to be picked up on my mother’s security camera with this guy in full view].
I have just heard from my employer (security) that although he called the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. [Staff Sergeant Doug Chisholm / Constable M.R.W. Picard] about this Jered guy [Unit 12] still harassing me at work, the latest was the last time I was on the job [September 9], and your Nanaimo R.C.M.P. have not even bothered to phone my employer back as I have asked for a Peace Bond against this guy!!!!
What does it take to get a Peace Bond??
Give your dumb-ass heads a shake R.C.M.P. … I’m sure if it was your child, the bastard threatening, harassing, and intimidating me would have been locked up long ago!!
Threats and demeanour of this Jered guy caught on tape 2nd September, 2007 [enclosed for each and every one of you, so you have no excuse to ignore the matter any longer].
At approximately noon, this Jered made a threat against my mother [“you are going to pay” for an imaginary event], which was caught on tape 2nd September.
You will see the true demeanour of this Jered [he has no intention of honouring his supposed agreement with Cnst. Picard to leave me alone, it shows his hatred, his volatile nature, his “unstable“ state of mind].
On this tape you can see Jered’s wife say that my R.C.M.P. complaint was a joke and that because her husband Jered was not charged by the R.C.M.P. her implication was that Jered was free to do as he pleased?
There are other disturbing “rantings” on the tape against my mother.
ASSAULT #2
Const. Samantha Staveley on 09 September basically asked my mother what she wanted the R.C.M.P. to do?
It’s quite simple, we both want the R.C.M.P. to do their job!
Const. Staveley said that my mother who is continually being called a pedophile / pervert by the woman in Unit 42 was simply like the old days in school, where children called each other names?
To be called a pedophile / pervert loud enough for all our neighbours to hear, and many of them work at the same place my mother does, is criminal behaviour and surely cannot be equated with children calling each other names!.
What nonsense is this … are you R.C.M.P. stupid or something!
My mother has lost all respect for the R.C.M.P. and thinks they are highly over-paid for what they actually do.
False accusations, pedophile / pervert comments caught on tape 2nd September & 3rd September [enclosed for each and every one of you, so you have no excuse to ignore the matter any longer].
UNIT 12 & UNIT 42 TAG TEAM MY MOTHER - CAUGHT ON TAPE
ON THE TAPE 2nd SEPTEMBER 2007
1. On the tape recorded at noon 2nd September, you will hear the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] say “dumb ass” preparing herself to do something to harass my mother.
2. You will see my mother [Brenda] getting out of a red car, come to the stairs well to the side.
3. You will see the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] purposefully go down the stairs moving toward my mother as she does.
4. You will see my mother move her body so she does not touch this Jenn Hughes or the baby she is carrying.
5. As this Jenn Hughes from Unit 42 moves past my mother, you will see that the baby does not fuss, it does not cry, it had NOT been touched by my mother.
6. You will see the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] move off camera, shouting back at my mother “way to go dumb ass, crashing into the baby.”
7. You will hear Jered?? [Unit 12] threaten my mother with “you’ll pay for that.”
8. You will hear Jered’s wife [Ashley] say that the R.C.M.P. thought my complaint was a joke and that since the R.C.M.P. did not charge her husband, the implication being that this Jered?? guy could do as he pleases to harass, intimidate, threaten myself and my mother.
9. You will hear this Jered [Unit 12] call my family losers.
10. You will hear the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] call my mother a pedophile / pervert.
11. Several minutes later you will hear the baby start to cry and to continue to cry??????
And the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say we just have to put up with this crap!!!
This appears to be Purposeful Child Abuse?
What is possibly more disturbing on the tape is the fact that this Jenn Hughes made the false claim that my mother ran into her baby [which the tape clearly proves I did not], she complained that my mother’s supposed bump into her baby led to it having a mark on its head [and the tape clearly shows that the baby did not fuss or cry when the woman passed by my mother holding her baby because my mother did not even touch the baby], yet a couple of minutes after she passed by my mother you can hear the baby start and continue to cry?
The question must be raised and investigated, did this Jenn Hughes [Unit 42] and / or Jered and wife, Ashley [Unit 12] purposefully harm the baby so it had a mark on its head because my mother said she was reporting her false statements to the police.
Because Const. Samantha Staveley was not available, my mother had Cnst. Wall come out to view the tape.
He confirmed there was no substance to their accusation against my mother.
Cnst. Wall did say the baby had a mark on its head.
My mother again played the tape for Cnst. Wall several times, showing that the baby did not fuss or cry when the woman passed by my mother holding her baby because my mother did not even touch the baby, yet a couple of minutes after she passed by my mother you can hear the baby start and continue to cry?
As mentioned, the question must be raised and investigated, did this Jenn Hughes [Unit 42] and / or Jered and wife, Ashley [Unit 12] purposefully harm the baby so it had a mark on its head because my mother said she was reporting Jenn Hughes’ [Unit 42] false statements to the police.
If Jenn Hughes [Unit 42] and / or Jered and wife, Ashley [Unit 12] purposefully harm the baby, this is child abuse in the extreme!
UNIT 42 CAUGHT ON TAPE
The very next day on 3rd September, this Jenn Hughes from Unit 42 was telling other new neighbours that my mother had caused the baby to suffer a concussion requiring medical care and/or hospital care?
The neighbours asked this Jenn Hughes if the baby was in hospital, to which Jenn Hughes replied, no he’s better he’s at home!
ON THE TAPE 3rd SEPTEMBER 2007
1. On the tape recorded at 10:30 a.m. 3rd September, you will hear this Jenn Hughes from Unit 42 talking to new tenants to the Complex saying that the baby had suffered a concussion requiring medical / hospital treatment.
2. Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] clearly lies when she said my mother elbowed the child, and you will see this “lying sack of suds” falsely demonstrate this to the new neighbours on the tape.
3. You will hear on tape, when these people ask how the baby is doing, the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] says that it is better and it back with Unit 12.
The question now becomes doubly important and investigated, did this Jenn Hughes [Unit 42] and / or Jered and wife, Ashley [Unit 12] purposefully harm the baby so it had a mark on its head because my mother said she was reporting her false statements to the police.
If there is no substance to her false accusations, and with the other episodes above, this woman is obviously “deranged“ in some fashion and should be charged with something?
Regards,
Pat B.A., B.Sc.
PEAMBScComplete@shaw.ca
13 September, 2007
Mr. Ron Parsons
Administrative Crown Council
Room 601, 17 Church Street
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5H5
Honourable Wally Oppal
Attorney General
PO Box 9044, STN PROV GOVT
Victoria, B.C. V8W 9E2
AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca
Mr. Leonard Krog
Opposition Critic for the Attorney General
Room 201
Parliament Buildings
Victoria, B.C. V8V 1X4
leonard.krog.mla@leg.bc.ca
Honourable Tom Christensen
Minister of Children and Family Development
PO Box 9057, STN PROV GOVT
Victoria, B.C. V8W 9E2
Minister.MCF@gems1.gov.bc.ca
Premier Gordon Campbell
Government of British Columbia
PO Box 9041
STN PROV GOVT
Victoria, B.C. V8W 9E1
premier@gov.bc.ca
William J.S. Elliott
RCMP Commissioner
Headquarters Bldg.
1200 Vanier Parkway
Ottawa, Ont. K1A 0R2
Superintendent Jeff Lott
R.C.M.P. Nanaimo
303 Prideaux Street
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 2N3
ASSAULT #1 Officers in Charge
Staff Sergeant Doug Chisholm
Constable M.R.W. Picard
R.C.M.P. Nanaimo
303 Prideaux Street
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 2N3
ASSAULT #2 Officers in Charge
Staff Sergeant Mike Wilton
Const. Samantha Staveley
Constable Jeanne Vestergaard
R.C.M.P. Nanaimo
303 Prideaux Street
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 2N3
Re: NO CONCRETE ACTION BY NANAIMO R.C.M.P. RELATED TO:
ASSAULT #1 - “death” comments, “threats of violence”, continued intimidation, harassment, at home and work site(s) - R.C.M.P. Complaint File # 2007-30449
ASSAULT #2 -”pedophile” / “pervert” statements, “incest” statements, threat statements, false accusation statements, and continued harassment / intimidation - R.C.M.P. Complaint File # 2007 - 24724; R.C.M.P. Complaint File # 2007 - 31803
Our situation is quite simple.
We are being “hammered” from some “quick tempered” bastard staying at Unit 12 and some miscreant tenant at Unit 42 and the R.C.M.P. have done nothing to take a Peace Bond and/or charge.
And the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say we just have to put up with this crap!!!
Absolute nonsense!!!
We are not going to put up with this crap and will someone get these Nanaimo R.C.M.P. “off their duffs” to obtain my Peace Bond and protect my mother!!!
In fact, Const. Samantha Staveley threatened my mother with charges if she continues to call the R.C.M.P. for help?
Well “chew on this” … I am so fed up that I’m putting it on the internet to see what the whole world things about the R.C.M.P. inaction!!!
ASSAULT #1
I don’t appreciate the R.C.M.P. dragging their feet in protecting me [I‘m a 20 year old, single female].
In fact, my employer got the distinct impression that the R.C.M.P. were hoping the whole matter would go away?
Well, believe me, it’s not going away!
I‘ve put up with “death” comments against me 22 August, “why don’t you just die,” “drop dead“ by Jered?? [staying at Unit 12] and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
I‘ve put up with “threats of violence” against me on 23 August, “I would like to punch your f----ing faces in” [R.C.M.P. Complaint File # 2007-30449] by Jered?? [staying at Unit 12] and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
This Jered has also been to my work site three times out of four, calling me a “piece of shit” just this past Sunday, 2nd September and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
This Jered guy again was again at my work site on September 9 when he passed by me this time calling me a “f---ing bitch”, giving me “the finger”, and walking off and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
Although this Jered guy had promised Cnst. Picard he would be long moved by this date, I saw this this Jered get into his van about 3:15 p.m., where this Jered guy gave me “the finger” again and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
I have not been sitting out front of my Unit for fear of this Jered guy!
However, what happens 12 September at about 7 p.m., when for the first time in weeks, I sit out front of my Unit … the adult male [Dan / George or whatever his name is] staying with the tenant Christine Sheppard at Unit 12 says to me “your time is coming soon” [caught on tape]?
Just like this gutless Jered guy, this Dan / George from Unit 12 said his comment low enough for me to hear [but luckily, his threat “your time is coming soon” was loud enough to be picked up on my mother’s security camera with this guy in full view].
I have just heard from my employer (security) that although he called the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. [Staff Sergeant Doug Chisholm / Constable M.R.W. Picard] about this Jered guy [Unit 12] still harassing me at work, the latest was the last time I was on the job [September 9], and your Nanaimo R.C.M.P. have not even bothered to phone my employer back as I have asked for a Peace Bond against this guy!!!!
What does it take to get a Peace Bond??
Give your dumb-ass heads a shake R.C.M.P. … I’m sure of it was your child, the bastard threatening, harassing, and intimidating me would have been locked up long ago!!
Threats and demeanour of this guy caught on tape 2nd September, 2007 [enclosed for each and every one of you, so you have no excuse to ignore the matter any longer].
At approximately noon, this Jered made a threat against my mother [“you are going to pay” for an imaginary event], which was caught on tape 2nd September.
You will see the true demeanour of this Jered [he has no intention of honouring his supposed agreement with Cnst. Picard to leave me alone, it shows his hatred, his volatile nature, his “unstable“ state of mind].
On this tape you can see Jered’s wife say that my R.C.M.P. complaint was a joke and that because her husband Jered was not charged by the R.C.M.P. her implication was that Jered was free to do as he pleased?
There are other disturbing “rantings” on the tape against my mother.
ASSAULT #2
Const. Samantha Staveley on 09 September basically asked my mother what she wanted the R.C.M.P. to do?
It’s quite simple, we both want the R.C.M.P. to do their job!
Const. Staveley said that my mother who is continually being called a pedophile / pervert by the woman in Unit 42 was simply like the old days in school, where children called each other names?
To be called a pedophile / pervert loud enough for all our neighbours to hear, and many of them work at the same place my mother does, is criminal behaviour and surely cannot be equated with children calling each other names!.
What nonsense is this … are you R.C.M.P. stupid or something!
My mother has lost all respect for the R.C.M.P. and thinks they are highly over-paid for what they actually do.
False accusations, pedophile / pervert comments caught on tape 2nd September & 3rd September [enclosed for each and every one of you, so you have no excuse to ignore the matter any longer].
UNIT 12 & UNIT 42 TAG TEAM MY MOTHER - CAUGHT ON TAPE
ON THE TAPE 2nd SEPTEMBER 2007
1. On the tape recorded at noon 2nd September, you will hear the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] say “dumb ass” preparing herself to do something to harass my mother.
2. You will see my mother [Brenda] getting out of a red car, come to the stairs well to the side.
3. You will see the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] purposefully go down the stairs moving toward my mother as she does.
4. You will see my mother move my body so I do not touch her or the baby she is carrying.
5. As the woman from Unit 42 moves past me, you will see that the baby does not fuss, it does not cry, it had NOT been touched by my mother.
6. You will see the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] move off camera, shouting back at my mother “way to go dumb ass, crashing into the baby.”
7. You will hear Jered?? [Unit 12] threaten my mother with “you’ll pay for that.”
8. You will hear Jered’s wife [Ashley] say that the R.C.M.P. though my complaint was a joke and that since the R.C.M.P. did not charge her husband, the implication being that that this Jered?? guy could do as he pleases to harass, intimidate, threaten myself and my mother.
9. You will hear this Jered [Unit 12] call my family losers.
10. You will hear the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] call my mother a pedophile / pervert.
11. Several minutes later you will hear the baby start to cry and to continue to cry??????
And the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say we just have to put up with this crap!!!
This appears to be Purposeful Child Abuse?
What is possibly more disturbing on the tape is the fact that this Jenn Hughes made the false claim that my mother ran into her baby [which the tape clearly proves I did not], she complained that my mother’s supposed bump into her baby led to it having a mark on its head [and the tape clearly shows that the baby did not fuss or cry when the woman passed by my mother holding her baby because my mother did not even touch the baby], yet a couple of minutes after she passed by my mother you can hear the baby start and continue to cry?
The question must be raised and investigated, did this Jenn Hughes [Unit 42] and / or Jered and wife, Ashley [Unit 12] purposefully harm the baby so it had a mark on its head because my mother said she was reporting her false statements to the police.
Because Const. Samantha Staveley was not available, my mother had Cnst. Wall come out to view the tape.
He confirmed there was no substance to their accusation against my mother.
Cnst. Wall did say the baby had a mark on its head.
My mother again played the tape for Cnst. Wall several times, showing that the baby did not fuss or cry when the woman passed by my mother holding her baby because my mother did not even touch the baby, yet a couple of minutes after she passed by my mother you can hear the baby start and continue to cry?
As mentioned, the question must be raised and investigated, did this Jenn Hughes purposefully harm the baby so it had a mark on its head because my mother said she was reporting Jenn Hughes’ [Unit 42] false statements to the police.
If Jenn Hughes [Unit 42] and / or Jered and wife, Ashley [Unit 12] purposefully harm the baby, this is child abuse in the extreme!
UNIT 42 CAUGHT ON TAPE
The very next day on 3rd September, this woman from Unit 42 was telling other neighbours that my mother had caused the baby to suffer a concussion requiring medical care and/or hospital care?
The neighbours asked this Jenn Hughes if the baby was in hospital, to which Jenn Hughes replied, no he’s better he’s at home!
ON THE TAPE 3rd SEPTEMBER 2007
1. On the tape recorded at 10:30 a.m. 3rd September, you will hear the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] talking to new tenants to the Complex saying that the baby had suffered a concussion requiring medical / hospital treatment.
2. Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] clearly lies when she said my mother elbowed the child, and you will see this “lying sack of suds” falsely demonstrate this to the new neighbours on the tape.
3. You will hear on tape, when these people ask how the baby is doing, the woman from Unit 42 [Jenn Hughes??] says that it is better and it back with Unit 12.
The question now becomes doubly important and investigated, did this Jenn Hughes [Unit 42] and / or Jered and wife, Ashley [Unit 12] purposefully harm the baby so it had a mark on its head because my mother said she was reporting her false statements to the police.
If there is no substance to her false accusations, and with the other episodes above, this woman is obviously “deranged“ in some fashion and should be charged with something?
Regards,
Pat
PEAMBScComplete@shaw.ca
LOL... You and your disgusting family are just a bunch of attention craving idiots and have made yourselves the laughing stock of the town! The police, Strata of your complex, MLA, Judge, Attorney General, Minister of Children and Family Development and RCMP Commissioner are all correct you guys are a "joke"...no one takes you seriously and you are the famous "boy who cried wolf family". How about you talk about how you stalk the accused every time they are in the shopping mall, or how your "pedophile\pervert" father stands outside in his underwear taking videos of the little children playing, or how your father is a racist pig and believes all people of color, single parents, etc are horrible people. And you Pat….were fired from your last place of employment (NCO) for being a DISHONEST EMPLOYEE, so how much creditability do you think you as a liar deserve. Your comment "My mother has lost all respect for the R.C.M.P. and thinks they are highly over-paid for what they actually do." is absolutely rude, the police don't have time to deal with your guys' made up accusations and garbage stories, they are out there helping people who actually need it. And what kind of sick person would come up with the idea that a mother would harm her 6 month old baby in order to make you guys look bad, how horrible are you to even say that!!! I have witnessed and been a part of the hatred slander that comes from your fathers filthy mouth, he proceeded to call me (a woman he knows nothing about) a piece of S**t over and over again from across the parking lot. Yes BOTH parties are guilty but not to the extent your blog states. How about you guys try telling both sides of the story, because god knows there would be absolutely no problems if your family would keeps their mouths shut and stop creating problems. Because of your tremendously over exaggerated stories a single mother of 2 was asked to leave the apartment where she was living temporarily with her mother, they had no where to go and were facing homelessness. You need to take this situation seriously and grow the hell up!!!! Stop talking about the horrible things other people are supposedly doing and focus on what your family is achieving and the name they have made for themselves! I would love to see this “video” you are making reference to
You know Patrica.....you can't actually put your credentials behind your name until you've actually earned a degree....maybe try BS behind your name.
Oh.....and have you heard of FOIP? It's illegal to record anyone without written consent or knowledge of you doing this. It is also disturbing that your family is taping children in the complex and obviously willing to share these recordings with the whole world via the internet! Do you own a mirror.....if so, take a long hard look at yourself and see how this could be percieved by the outside world and to those R.C.M.P officers you are so quick to judge. Better watch out, cause big brother is watching!
Never in my life have I laughed so hard when I read your blog. Thanks for the laugh....
I Belive you have Broken the Law
Once personal information has been collected, it is governed by rules regarding use and disclosure. Under Section 7 of the Privacy Act, it may only be used for the purpose collected, or for a "consistent purpose". For example, if the stated purpose of the camera system is to catch vandals, it could not be used to spot people using a community drug user clinic. Treasury Board guidelines suggest that, for a purpose to be "consistent", it should have a "reasonable and direct connection" to the original purpose. They also suggest that such a purpose should be one for which a reasonable person would expect the information to be used.
Under Section 8 of the Privacy Act, the federal government may disclose personal information without the individual's consent in certain circumstances including (but not limited to) for consistent purposes, where authorized under an Act of Parliament, where required by court order, for research or statistical purposes, and to specified agencies for law enforcement purposes. Disclosure is also permitted where "in the opinion of the head of the [government] institution, the public interest in disclosure clearly outweighs any invasion of privacy that could result from the disclosure". Consistent with this approach, police-camera footage of identifiable individuals could not normally be sent to, say, the National Film Board for the purposes of making a documentary, without the individuals' consent.
It seems to me that you feel a need to point out the faults of others only to cover up your own issues. More important than the conversations of your neighbours and your utter disregard to other people's privacy why don't you post your opinions on why you chose to focus on these neighbours for example the fact that they opt to socialize with negros and the fact that they allowed "those black people" to own a home and have freedom. Is this not the real reason for your hatred of your fellow neighbours. As well maybe if you gained employment you would be less focussed on other peole's lives. If what goes on outside your windows bothers you so much then stop recording it for playback time after time after time. In essence you have shown everyone in the cyber world how ignorant you are. Instead of trying to lend a hand to a struggling nieghbour you choose to make their lives even harder.If you really hate people so much why moe into a "Family" complex. You started a war for no reason rather then trying to become part of a community.I think it's sad that you have taught your children to be introverts like their parents they didn't even have a fighting chance and truly think their cause is worth fighting for.How pathetic!!!
Oh and it would be one thing if it was just one officer that you had a complaint about but it should tellyou something when it's almost a third of the force(they can't all be wrong LOL)
What laws limit the right of private individuals and organizations to engage in public video surveillance?
As with government surveillance, private sector collection, use and disclosure of personal information about identifiable individuals is governed by generic privacy legislation. This means, in BC and Alberta, their respective Personal Information and Privacy Acts (PIPA); in Quebec, the Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels dans le secteur privé; and, in the rest of Canada, the Federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). PIPEDA also applies to federally-regulated private sector bodies, such as banks and airlines. These statutes feature, broadly-speaking, similar principles to the public-sector legislation, but tend to have a narrower set of exceptions to the rule of consent. It is worth noting that they do not feature the requirement that information must be "recorded" in order to qualify as "personal information". Logically, then, PIPEDA and the related provincial statutes could also apply to video surveillance systems which do not feature recording.
One of the key principles of PIPEDA is that personal information must only be collected with the knowledge and consent of the individual, except where specifically permitted. Consent, though, need not be explicit. One might plausibly argue, for instance, that an individual implicitly consents to video surveillance by walking past a high-security building, or by attending a privately-organized concert in a public park. In both of these cases, the knowledge requirement can be satisfied through the use of appropriate signage.
Exceptions to the consent rule (e.g., under Section 7 of PIPEDA) are also worth discussing, given that most instances of public video surveillance will be ones in which there is no plausible consent. Notably, information can be collected without consent where it is being collected solely for journalistic, artistic or literary purposes, or where such collection is clearly in the individual's best interest and consent cannot be obtained in a timely manner. Collection without consent is also permitted in the context of investigating the breach of an agreement or a law, where consent would compromise the accuracy or availability of the information - as in, for instance, the use of video surveillance by an insurance company to confirm a person's disability.
Even given these exceptions, PIPEDA requires that collection of personal information be limited to that which is necessary to fulfill the purposes identified. Moreover, the purposes must be reasonable. So, for example, the hypothetical insurance company above could not record all passers-by on a busy street for a week in the hope of catching its specific target.
Use and disclosure of personal information is also limited to the original purposes for which the information was collected, or other purposes to which the individual has consented. As well, once the information is no longer needed for the agreed purposes, it must be destroyed or rendered anonymous.
Also worth noting is that, if public video surveillance is performed by a private entity for a public body, the relevant public-sector legislation applies. This would apply in the case of a contractor being hired to operate a public surveillance system.
Who has access to tapes recorded via public CCTV?
Under guidelines published by federal and provincial privacy commissioners in Canada, access to video surveillance footage should be restricted to authorized persons involved in administering the system. It may also be made available to law enforcement agencies on request.
In addition, under public-sector privacy legislation, individuals have a right of access to footage of themselves, provided that this can be done without infringing on the privacy rights of others featured in the footage (this can be accomplished, for example, by blurring out the faces of other individuals using computer software).
How long can tapes recorded via public CCTV be kept?
Where footage has not been used for any particular purpose (for instance, dispatching police, or as evidence of an incident), both federal and provincial guidelines recommend that tapes be destroyed after a "limited time". This has been interpreted by privacy commissioners as anywhere from 24 hours to 30 days.
Where tapes have been used to make a decision about an individual (for example, if video operators catch an incident on tape), they must be retained for a minimum period of time, depending on the applicable laws. For instance, the applicable Alberta, BC, and Ontario acts prescribe a minimum retention period of one year, while the federal Privacy Act prescribes a minimum retention period of two years.
So my question to you is do we need this to go to court or will you sit back, remove the camera and stop all the harassment and complaints
This Jered guy again was again at my work site on September 9 when he passed by me this time calling me a “f---ing bitch”, giving me “the finger”, and walking off and the Nanaimo R.C.M.P. say I have to just put up with it?
Incall Korean Escorts
sex cams
Post a Comment